This is an old revision of the document!
Triangulation
Triangulation is a method from the social sciences for understanding real-world phenomena by combining multiple theoretical perspectives and methods. The aim is to compensate for the limitations of any single method and to strengthen the credibility of findings through convergence across different approaches.
Why triangulation
Smart grid transitions cannot be fully understood from any one disciplinary perspective. Engineering analysis reveals what is technically feasible. Institutional analysis explains what rules and incentives make certain options viable. The study of actors and practices shows who acts and how. Each approach illuminates something the others miss, and each carries specific blind spots.
Using multiple perspectives in combination makes it possible to understand phenomena in a more differentiated way: to identify priorities based on a fuller picture, to spot where different framings are compatible and where they conflict, and to develop options that are robust across more than one frame of analysis.
A finding that holds across independent perspectives is more credible than one that depends on a single method or theory.
The three perspectives
The ISGAN Wiki develops every topic from three complementary perspectives. These are not separate boxes to fill in; they are lenses that each illuminate different aspects of the same phenomenon. The value comes from applying them in combination and making the connections explicit.
Actors and stakeholders
This perspective addresses the activities and practices of the groups whose actions shape smart grid transitions: energy suppliers, producers, aggregators, storage providers, and consumers at the grid edge; transmission and distribution operators and balancing parties; policy makers, regulatory bodies, civil society organisations, and citizens; and technology providers and research organisations.
The central questions are: who acts, under what conditions, and with what effect?
Key disciplines: microeconomics, behavioural economics, organisational studies, business administration.
Technologies and infrastructure
This perspective addresses the technical components, systems, and infrastructures that make up the electricity system, and the ways they can be configured to fulfil system functions. It covers generation, transmission, distribution, and storage as functionalities of a cyber-physical system, including the digital layer of data exchange, control systems, and communication protocols.
The central questions are: what is technically possible, and how are functions distributed across the system?
Key disciplines: electrical engineering, informatics, systems engineering.
Institutional structures
This perspective addresses the rules, regulations, norms, and cognitive frameworks that govern the electricity system: markets for power and energy, grid codes, regulatory frameworks for grid operation and balancing, and rules for energy communities and aggregation.
The central question is: what does the institutional structure make possible, incentivise, or block?
Key disciplines: institutional and evolutionary economics, political science, sociology.
How perspectives are used on topic pages
Each topic page in this wiki develops its subject from all three perspectives. The Perspectives section on every topic page is structured accordingly, with subsections for actors and stakeholders, technologies and infrastructure, and institutional structures. Where one perspective is particularly central to a topic, this is noted in the introduction to the section.
The goal is not to give each perspective equal word count, but to ensure that readers from each disciplinary background find their framing engaged and connected to the others.