Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
topics:systems [2026/03/25 02:12] – admintopics:systems [2026/04/13 09:48] (current) – o.sachs
Line 6: Line 6:
 <WRAP meta> <WRAP meta>
 lead-authors: [Name] lead-authors: [Name]
-contributors: [Names]+contributors: Vitaliy Soloviy
 reviewers: [Names] reviewers: [Names]
 version: 0.7 version: 0.7
Line 19: Line 19:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-<WRAP insight> 
-Systems thinking reveals why energy interventions produce unintended consequences, where leverage points lie, and how technical and social change co-evolve. 
-</WRAP> 
  
 ===== Why this matters ===== ===== Why this matters =====
Line 59: Line 56:
  
 The MLP's regime concept is primarily an actor concept: incumbent utilities, regulators, and established market participants co-produce the rules that stabilise the existing system. Transitions require either regime destabilisation from outside pressure, or niche innovations gaining sufficient momentum to challenge regime logic. Social smartness and democratic participation determine whether technically capable systems achieve their intended aims in practice, as studies of microgrid deployments have shown.((Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. //Joule//, 1(3), 463–479.)) The MLP's regime concept is primarily an actor concept: incumbent utilities, regulators, and established market participants co-produce the rules that stabilise the existing system. Transitions require either regime destabilisation from outside pressure, or niche innovations gaining sufficient momentum to challenge regime logic. Social smartness and democratic participation determine whether technically capable systems achieve their intended aims in practice, as studies of microgrid deployments have shown.((Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. //Joule//, 1(3), 463–479.))
- 
-@@GAP: case example needed — actors perspective@@ 
  
 ==== Technologies and infrastructure ==== ==== Technologies and infrastructure ====
  
 A cyber-physical system (CPS) combines physical processes with embedded computation, networking, and real-time control. The smart grid has been characterised as a system of CPS that must work together to exchange data and perform predictably.((NARUC. (2021). //Understanding cybersecurity for the smart grid//. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.)) NIST's smart grid conceptual model identifies seven functional domains — bulk generation, transmission, distribution, markets, operations, service provider, and customer — and the interfaces across which interoperable, secure data exchange must take place.((NIST. (2021). //Framework and roadmap for smart grid interoperability standards, release 4.0//. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1108r4)) This expands operational capabilities while simultaneously expanding the cybersecurity attack surface. Security thus becomes a systemic property of the infrastructure, not a separate concern. A cyber-physical system (CPS) combines physical processes with embedded computation, networking, and real-time control. The smart grid has been characterised as a system of CPS that must work together to exchange data and perform predictably.((NARUC. (2021). //Understanding cybersecurity for the smart grid//. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.)) NIST's smart grid conceptual model identifies seven functional domains — bulk generation, transmission, distribution, markets, operations, service provider, and customer — and the interfaces across which interoperable, secure data exchange must take place.((NIST. (2021). //Framework and roadmap for smart grid interoperability standards, release 4.0//. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1108r4)) This expands operational capabilities while simultaneously expanding the cybersecurity attack surface. Security thus becomes a systemic property of the infrastructure, not a separate concern.
- 
-@@GAP: case example needed — technologies perspective@@ 
  
 ==== Institutional structures ==== ==== Institutional structures ====
  
 The technological innovation systems (TIS) approach analyses how new energy technologies emerge and challenge incumbents through seven system functions: knowledge development and diffusion, entrepreneurial experimentation, direction of search, market formation, legitimation, resource mobilisation, and positive externalities.((Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems. //Research Policy//, 37(3), 407–429.)) An innovation ecosystem frames this relationally: the interdependent network of entrepreneurs, technology providers, research organisations, financiers, regulators, and users whose coordinated activity enables commercialisation and scaling. ICT firms entering the electricity sector have been identified as potential catalysts for sectoral change, bringing business models and institutional logics that do not fit the traditional utility-centred system.((Erlinghagen, S., & Markard, J. (2012). Smart grids and the transformation of the electricity sector: ICT firms as potential catalysts for sectoral change. //Energy Policy//, 51, 895–906.)) The technological innovation systems (TIS) approach analyses how new energy technologies emerge and challenge incumbents through seven system functions: knowledge development and diffusion, entrepreneurial experimentation, direction of search, market formation, legitimation, resource mobilisation, and positive externalities.((Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems. //Research Policy//, 37(3), 407–429.)) An innovation ecosystem frames this relationally: the interdependent network of entrepreneurs, technology providers, research organisations, financiers, regulators, and users whose coordinated activity enables commercialisation and scaling. ICT firms entering the electricity sector have been identified as potential catalysts for sectoral change, bringing business models and institutional logics that do not fit the traditional utility-centred system.((Erlinghagen, S., & Markard, J. (2012). Smart grids and the transformation of the electricity sector: ICT firms as potential catalysts for sectoral change. //Energy Policy//, 51, 895–906.))
- 
-@@GAP: case example needed — institutional perspective@@ 
  
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
Line 93: Line 84:
  
 ===== Topic notes ===== ===== Topic notes =====
- 
-**Gaps to address before Gate 1:** 
-  * Case examples missing from all three perspectives 
-  * Second paragraph in Why this matters could develop the smart grid transitions angle more directly 
-  * Verification of all references in progress (noted in ai-use field) 
  
 **Contribution welcome** — this draft has substantive content but is incomplete. If you have relevant expertise, contribute directly via the edit button or the [[about:newtopic|Topic Builder]]. Read the [[about:guidelines|Editorial Guidelines]] before contributing. **Contribution welcome** — this draft has substantive content but is incomplete. If you have relevant expertise, contribute directly via the edit button or the [[about:newtopic|Topic Builder]]. Read the [[about:guidelines|Editorial Guidelines]] before contributing.
  
-**AI use record** \\ +~~DISCUSSION~~
-Stage: research synthesis and editorial revision \\ +
-Type: structuring from source material \\ +
-Tool: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) \\ +
-Reviewed by: @@name@@ +