Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
topics:stakeholders [2026/03/18 14:58] – admintopics:stakeholders [2026/03/18 14:59] (current) – admin
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 ^ Attribute ^ Meaning in energy system context ^ ^ Attribute ^ Meaning in energy system context ^
-| **Power** | The ability to influence decisions, access resources, or impose costs — held by large utilities, regulators, or politically connected industry associations | +| **Power** | The ability to influence decisions, access resources, or impose costs, held by large utilities, regulators, or politically connected industry associations | 
-| **Legitimacy** | The socially accepted right to be heard — held by affected communities, consumer representatives, or environmental bodies | +| **Legitimacy** | The socially accepted right to be heard, held by affected communities, consumer representatives, or environmental bodies | 
-| **Urgency** | The degree to which claims demand immediate attention — driven by time-sensitive impacts such as grid disruption, energy poverty, or imminent infrastructure siting decisions |+| **Urgency** | The degree to which claims demand immediate attention, driven by time-sensitive impacts such as grid disruption, energy poverty, or imminent infrastructure siting decisions |
  
-The combination of these attributes determines stakeholder type. Stakeholders holding all three — power, legitimacy, and urgency — are definitive stakeholders whose claims must be addressed. Those holding only one attribute are latent stakeholders who may become more salient as circumstances change. For example, a community group opposing a grid development may gain urgency as a decision deadline approaches and power if it secures legal standing — shifting from a demanding stakeholder to a more influential category.+The combination of these attributes determines stakeholder type. Stakeholders holding all three elements (power, legitimacy, and urgency) are definitive stakeholders whose claims must be addressed. Those holding only one attribute are latent stakeholders who may become more salient as circumstances change. For example, a community group opposing a grid development may gain urgency as a decision deadline approaches and power if it secures legal standing, shifting from a demanding stakeholder to a more influential category.
  
 ===== Perspectives ===== ===== Perspectives =====
Line 80: Line 80:
 ==== Institutional structures ==== ==== Institutional structures ====
  
-Institutional frameworks determine who has formal standing as a stakeholder in regulatory processes, planning decisions, and market design. Requirements for public consultation, environmental impact assessment, and consumer representation create legal channels through which stakeholder interests enter governance processes. Where these channels are absent or poorly designed, dominant actors may capture regulatory processes while less powerful stakeholders — dependent communities, low-income households, or future users — remain excluded.+Institutional frameworks determine who has formal standing as a stakeholder in regulatory processes, planning decisions, and market design. Requirements for public consultation, environmental impact assessment, and consumer representation create legal channels through which stakeholder interests enter governance processes. Where these channels are absent or poorly designed, dominant actors may capture regulatory processes while less powerful stakeholders, such as dependent communities, low-income households, or future users often remain excluded.
  
 <WRAP case> <WRAP case>
 **South Africa -- integrated resource planning** \\ **South Africa -- integrated resource planning** \\
-The IRP 2019 process included formal consultation phases engaging labour unions, civil society, and communities affected by coal plant retirements alongside utilities and generators. The salience of mining community stakeholders — holding high urgency and growing legitimacy as plant closures approached — influenced the planning timeline for coal exit.((Department of Mineral Resources and Energy, South Africa. (2019). //Integrated Resource Plan 2019.// DMRE. https://www.dmre.gov.za/Portals/0/Energy_Website/IRP/2019/IRP-2019.pdf))+The IRP 2019 process included formal consultation phases engaging labour unions, civil society, and communities affected by coal plant retirements alongside utilities and generators. The salience of mining community stakeholders holding high urgency and growing legitimacy as plant closures approached is influenced the planning timeline for coal exit.((Department of Mineral Resources and Energy, South Africa. (2019). //Integrated Resource Plan 2019.// DMRE. https://www.dmre.gov.za/Portals/0/Energy_Website/IRP/2019/IRP-2019.pdf))
 </WRAP> </WRAP>