Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| topics:stakeholders [2026/03/18 11:06] – admin | topics:stakeholders [2026/03/18 14:59] (current) – admin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ===== Why this matters ===== | ===== Why this matters ===== | ||
| - | Energy system transitions involve a wide range of interests that do not align automatically. Grid operators need predictable technical standards. Communities near new infrastructure have concerns about siting and amenity. Environmental organisations focus on emissions and land use. Investors need long-term policy certainty. Regulatory bodies balance competing mandates. Each of these parties can influence whether a transition moves forward, stalls, or provokes opposition | + | Energy system transitions involve a wide range of interests that do not align automatically. Grid operators need predictable technical standards. Communities near new infrastructure have concerns about siting and amenity. Environmental organisations focus on emissions and land use. Investors need long-term policy certainty. Regulatory bodies balance competing mandates. Each of these parties can influence whether a transition moves forward, stalls, or provokes opposition, even when they are not directly involved in electricity markets or grid operations day to day. |
| <WRAP callout> | <WRAP callout> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| Stakeholders are those who have interests, claims, or rights in relation to the activities and outcomes of an organisation or system, whether or not they are directly involved in its operations.((Mitchell, | Stakeholders are those who have interests, claims, or rights in relation to the activities and outcomes of an organisation or system, whether or not they are directly involved in its operations.((Mitchell, | ||
| - | Mitchell, Agle, and Wood identify three attributes that determine stakeholder salience | + | Mitchell, Agle, and Wood identify three attributes that determine stakeholder salience, the degree to which a stakeholder attracts attention and shapes outcomes: |
| ^ Attribute ^ Meaning in energy system context ^ | ^ Attribute ^ Meaning in energy system context ^ | ||
| - | | **Power** | The ability to influence decisions, access resources, or impose costs — held by large utilities, regulators, or politically connected industry associations | | + | | **Power** | The ability to influence decisions, access resources, or impose costs, held by large utilities, regulators, or politically connected industry associations | |
| - | | **Legitimacy** | The socially accepted right to be heard — held by affected communities, | + | | **Legitimacy** | The socially accepted right to be heard, held by affected communities, |
| - | | **Urgency** | The degree to which claims demand immediate attention | + | | **Urgency** | The degree to which claims demand immediate attention, driven by time-sensitive impacts such as grid disruption, energy poverty, or imminent infrastructure siting decisions | |
| - | The combination of these attributes determines stakeholder type. Stakeholders holding all three — power, legitimacy, and urgency | + | The combination of these attributes determines stakeholder type. Stakeholders holding all three elements (power, legitimacy, and urgency) are definitive stakeholders whose claims must be addressed. Those holding only one attribute are latent stakeholders who may become more salient as circumstances change. For example, a community group opposing a grid development may gain urgency as a decision deadline approaches and power if it secures legal standing, shifting from a demanding stakeholder to a more influential category. |
| ===== Perspectives ===== | ===== Perspectives ===== | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| ==== Institutional structures ==== | ==== Institutional structures ==== | ||
| - | Institutional frameworks determine who has formal standing as a stakeholder in regulatory processes, planning decisions, and market design. Requirements for public consultation, | + | Institutional frameworks determine who has formal standing as a stakeholder in regulatory processes, planning decisions, and market design. Requirements for public consultation, |
| <WRAP case> | <WRAP case> | ||
| **South Africa -- integrated resource planning** \\ | **South Africa -- integrated resource planning** \\ | ||
| - | The IRP 2019 process included formal consultation phases engaging labour unions, civil society, and communities affected by coal plant retirements alongside utilities and generators. The salience of mining community stakeholders | + | The IRP 2019 process included formal consultation phases engaging labour unions, civil society, and communities affected by coal plant retirements alongside utilities and generators. The salience of mining community stakeholders holding high urgency and growing legitimacy as plant closures approached |
| </ | </ | ||