Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
topics:stakeholders [2026/03/18 11:06] – admintopics:stakeholders [2026/04/13 10:58] (current) – o.sachs
Line 1: Line 1:
-<WRAP catbadge green>Actors & Stakeholders</WRAP>+<WRAP catbadge green>Actors & Stakeholders 
 +</WRAP>
  
 ====== Stakeholders ====== ====== Stakeholders ======
Line 7: Line 8:
 contributors: [Names] contributors: [Names]
 reviewers: [Names] reviewers: [Names]
-version: 1.0 +version: 1.1 
-updated: March 2026+updated: 25 March 2026
 sensitivity: low sensitivity: low
-ai-disclosure: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) assisted with topic structuring, editorial revision, reference verification, and wiki formatting; reviewed by [name], 18.03.2026+status: in-review 
 +ai-use: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) was used for topic structuring, editorial revision, reference verification, and wiki formatting; reviewed by [name], 18.03.2026
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
Line 16: Line 18:
 Stakeholders are individuals, groups, and organisations that have an interest or stake in how the electricity system functions and develops, and whose engagement shapes the framework conditions under which the system operates. Understanding who the stakeholders are, what they want, and how much influence they hold is essential for designing governance processes, regulatory reforms, and transition pathways that are durable and legitimate. Stakeholders are individuals, groups, and organisations that have an interest or stake in how the electricity system functions and develops, and whose engagement shapes the framework conditions under which the system operates. Understanding who the stakeholders are, what they want, and how much influence they hold is essential for designing governance processes, regulatory reforms, and transition pathways that are durable and legitimate.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 +
  
 ===== Why this matters ===== ===== Why this matters =====
  
-Energy system transitions involve a wide range of interests that do not align automatically. Grid operators need predictable technical standards. Communities near new infrastructure have concerns about siting and amenity. Environmental organisations focus on emissions and land use. Investors need long-term policy certainty. Regulatory bodies balance competing mandates. Each of these parties can influence whether a transition moves forward, stalls, or provokes opposition — even when they are not directly involved in electricity markets or grid operations day to day.+Energy system transitions involve a wide range of interests that do not align automatically. Grid operators need predictable technical standards. Communities near new infrastructure have concerns about siting and amenity. Environmental organisations focus on emissions and land use. Investors need long-term policy certainty. Regulatory bodies balance competing mandates. Each of these parties can influence whether a transition moves forward, stalls, or provokes opposition, even when they are not directly involved in electricity markets or grid operations day to day.
  
 <WRAP callout> <WRAP callout>
Line 27: Line 30:
 Smart grid transitions expand the stakeholder landscape considerably. Consumers who were once purely passive recipients of electricity become potential participants in demand response, local generation, or community energy. Platform operators and data service providers enter the system from outside the traditional utility model. Local governments gain relevance as planning authorities for charging infrastructure and distributed generation. Managing the interests of this broader group requires governance capacity that legacy regulatory frameworks were not designed to provide. Smart grid transitions expand the stakeholder landscape considerably. Consumers who were once purely passive recipients of electricity become potential participants in demand response, local generation, or community energy. Platform operators and data service providers enter the system from outside the traditional utility model. Local governments gain relevance as planning authorities for charging infrastructure and distributed generation. Managing the interests of this broader group requires governance capacity that legacy regulatory frameworks were not designed to provide.
  
-===== A shared definition =====+===== Shared definitions =====
  
 Stakeholders are those who have interests, claims, or rights in relation to the activities and outcomes of an organisation or system, whether or not they are directly involved in its operations.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) In electricity systems, stakeholders include all those affected by or able to influence the development, operation, and governance of grids, markets, and infrastructure, including communities, environmental bodies, investors, workers, and public authorities. Stakeholders are those who have interests, claims, or rights in relation to the activities and outcomes of an organisation or system, whether or not they are directly involved in its operations.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) In electricity systems, stakeholders include all those affected by or able to influence the development, operation, and governance of grids, markets, and infrastructure, including communities, environmental bodies, investors, workers, and public authorities.
  
-Mitchell, Agle, and Wood identify three attributes that determine stakeholder salience — the degree to which a stakeholder attracts attention and shapes outcomes:((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105))+Mitchell, Agle, and Wood identify three attributes that determine stakeholder salience, the degree to which a stakeholder attracts attention and shapes outcomes:((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) 
 + 
 +<WRAP tablecap> 
 +**Table 1.** Three attributes of stakeholder salience in energy system contexts.\\ 
 +//Source: Mitchell, Agle & Wood (1997).// 
 +</WRAP>
  
 ^ Attribute ^ Meaning in energy system context ^ ^ Attribute ^ Meaning in energy system context ^
-| **Power** | The ability to influence decisions, access resources, or impose costs — held by large utilities, regulators, or politically connected industry associations | +| **Power** | The ability to influence decisions, access resources, or impose costs, held by large utilities, regulators, or politically connected industry associations | 
-| **Legitimacy** | The socially accepted right to be heard — held by affected communities, consumer representatives, or environmental bodies | +| **Legitimacy** | The socially accepted right to be heard, held by affected communities, consumer representatives, or environmental bodies | 
-| **Urgency** | The degree to which claims demand immediate attention — driven by time-sensitive impacts such as grid disruption, energy poverty, or imminent infrastructure siting decisions |+| **Urgency** | The degree to which claims demand immediate attention, driven by time-sensitive impacts such as grid disruption, energy poverty, or imminent infrastructure siting decisions |
  
-The combination of these attributes determines stakeholder type. Stakeholders holding all three — power, legitimacy, and urgency — are definitive stakeholders whose claims must be addressed. Those holding only one attribute are latent stakeholders who may become more salient as circumstances change. For example, a community group opposing a grid development may gain urgency as a decision deadline approaches and power if it secures legal standing — shifting from a demanding stakeholder to a more influential category.+The combination of these attributes determines stakeholder type. Stakeholders holding all three are definitive stakeholders whose claims must be addressed. Those holding only one attribute are latent stakeholders who may become more salient as circumstances change. A community group opposing a grid development may gain urgency as a decision deadline approaches and power if it secures legal standing, shifting from a demanding to a more influential category. 
 + 
 +<WRAP tablecap> 
 +**Table 2.** Key terms in stakeholder analysis. 
 +</WRAP> 
 + 
 +^ Term ^ Definition ^ 
 +| **Stakeholder** | An individual, group, or organisation with an interest or claim in relation to the activities and outcomes of a system, whether or not they participate directly in its operations.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) | 
 +| **Stakeholder salience** | The degree to which a stakeholder attracts attention and shapes decisions, determined by the combination of power, legitimacy, and urgency they hold.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) | 
 +| **Definitive stakeholder** | A stakeholder who holds power, legitimacy, and urgency simultaneously, and whose claims therefore have the highest salience and require active management.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) | 
 +| **Latent stakeholder** | A stakeholder holding only one salience attribute and therefore less likely to attract immediate attention, though capable of becoming more salient as conditions change.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) | 
 +| **Stakeholder engagement** | A structured process through which organisations identify, consult, and incorporate stakeholder interests into decision-making, planning, or regulatory design. |
  
 ===== Perspectives ===== ===== Perspectives =====
Line 80: Line 99:
 ==== Institutional structures ==== ==== Institutional structures ====
  
-Institutional frameworks determine who has formal standing as a stakeholder in regulatory processes, planning decisions, and market design. Requirements for public consultation, environmental impact assessment, and consumer representation create legal channels through which stakeholder interests enter governance processes. Where these channels are absent or poorly designed, dominant actors may capture regulatory processes while less powerful stakeholders — dependent communities, low-income households, or future users — remain excluded.+Institutional frameworks determine who has formal standing as a stakeholder in regulatory processes, planning decisions, and market design. Requirements for public consultation, environmental impact assessment, and consumer representation create legal channels through which stakeholder interests enter governance processes. Where these channels are absent or poorly designed, dominant actors may capture regulatory processes while less powerful stakeholders, such as dependent communities, low-income households, or future users, remain excluded.
  
 <WRAP case> <WRAP case>
 **South Africa -- integrated resource planning** \\ **South Africa -- integrated resource planning** \\
-The IRP 2019 process included formal consultation phases engaging labour unions, civil society, and communities affected by coal plant retirements alongside utilities and generators. The salience of mining community stakeholders — holding high urgency and growing legitimacy as plant closures approached — influenced the planning timeline for coal exit.((Department of Mineral Resources and Energy, South Africa. (2019). //Integrated Resource Plan 2019.// DMRE. https://www.dmre.gov.za/Portals/0/Energy_Website/IRP/2019/IRP-2019.pdf))+The IRP 2019 process included formal consultation phases engaging labour unions, civil society, and communities affected by coal plant retirements alongside utilities and generators. The salience of mining community stakeholders holding high urgency and growing legitimacy as plant closures approached influenced the planning timeline for coal exit.((Department of Mineral Resources and Energy, South Africa. (2019). //Integrated Resource Plan 2019.// DMRE. https://www.dmre.gov.za/Portals/0/Energy_Website/IRP/2019/IRP-2019.pdf))
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 <WRAP case> <WRAP case>
 **Nigeria -- multi-stakeholder governance of mini-grids** \\ **Nigeria -- multi-stakeholder governance of mini-grids** \\
-Off-grid electricity provision in Nigeria involves communities, private operators, the Rural Electrification Agency, and local governments — each holding different combinations of power, legitimacy, and urgency. The regulatory framework has evolved to create formal channels through which community stakeholders can participate in licensing and tariff-setting decisions.((Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission. (2024). //Eligible customer regulations 2024.// NERC. https://nerc.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-NERC-ELEIGIBLE-CUSTOMER-REGULATIONS.pdf))+Off-grid electricity provision in Nigeria involves communities, private operators, the Rural Electrification Agency, and local governments, each holding different combinations of power, legitimacy, and urgency. The regulatory framework has evolved to create formal channels through which community stakeholders can participate in licensing and tariff-setting decisions.((Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission. (2024). //Eligible customer regulations 2024.// NERC. https://nerc.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-NERC-ELEIGIBLE-CUSTOMER-REGULATIONS.pdf))
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
- 
-===== Key terms ===== 
- 
-^ Term ^ Definition ^ 
-| **Stakeholder** | An individual, group, or organisation with an interest or claim in relation to the activities and outcomes of a system, whether or not they participate directly in its operations.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) | 
-| **Stakeholder salience** | The degree to which a stakeholder attracts attention and shapes decisions, determined by the combination of power, legitimacy, and urgency they hold.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) | 
-| **Definitive stakeholder** | A stakeholder who holds power, legitimacy, and urgency simultaneously, and whose claims therefore have the highest salience and require active management.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) | 
-| **Latent stakeholder** | A stakeholder holding only one of the three salience attributes — power, legitimacy, or urgency — and therefore less likely to attract immediate attention, though capable of becoming more salient as conditions change.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105)) | 
-| **Stakeholder engagement** | A structured process through which organisations identify, consult, and incorporate stakeholder interests into decision-making, planning, or regulatory design. | 
  
 ===== Distinctions and overlaps ===== ===== Distinctions and overlaps =====
Line 112: Line 122:
 <WRAP distinction> <WRAP distinction>
 **Stakeholder salience vs. stakeholder importance** \\ **Stakeholder salience vs. stakeholder importance** \\
-Salience describes how much attention a stakeholder receives from decision-makers, based on power, legitimacy, and urgency. Importance is a normative judgment about whose interests should count. High salience does not guarantee that a stakeholder's interests are well-served; low-salience stakeholders — such as future generations or geographically dispersed communities — may have significant normative claims that are structurally underrepresented.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105))+Salience describes how much attention a stakeholder receives from decision-makers, based on power, legitimacy, and urgency. Importance is a normative judgment about whose interests should count. High salience does not guarantee that a stakeholder's interests are well-served; low-salience stakeholders such as future generations or geographically dispersed communities may have significant normative claims that are structurally underrepresented.((Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105))
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 ===== Related topics ===== ===== Related topics =====
  
-{{tag>actors_-_roles_-_agents energy_communities_and_other_grid_edge_activities Governance Institutions social_practice}} +[[topics:actors_roles|Actors and roles]] · [[topics:energy_communities|Energy communities]] · [[topics:governance|Governance]] · [[topics:institutions|Institutions]] · [[topics:social_practice|Social practice]]
- +
-===== References =====+