Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| topics:smartness [2026/03/21 00:04] – Status: in-development admin | topics:smartness [2026/04/19 20:50] (current) – vso_vso | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | <WRAP catbadge | + | <WRAP catbadge> |
| - | status: in-development | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| ====== Smartness ====== | ====== Smartness ====== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 6: | ||
| lead-authors: | lead-authors: | ||
| contributors: | contributors: | ||
| - | reviewers: | + | reviewers: |
| version: 2.0 | version: 2.0 | ||
| updated: 17 March 2026 | updated: 17 March 2026 | ||
| sensitivity: | sensitivity: | ||
| - | ai-disclosure: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) | + | ai-use: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) |
| + | status: draft | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| <WRAP intro> | <WRAP intro> | ||
| - | Smartness in electricity | + | Smartness in energy |
| </ | </ | ||
| + | |||
| ===== Why this matters ===== | ===== Why this matters ===== | ||
| - | Smartness regards how technical capabilities translate into outcomes depends on whether the actors, institutions, | + | How technical capabilities translate into outcomes depends on whether the actors, institutions, |
| <WRAP callout> | <WRAP callout> | ||
| - | Smart grids require various types of smartness, including | + | Implementation |
| </ | </ | ||
| - | ===== A shared definition | + | ===== Shared definitions |
| - | Smartness, in the context of smart grid transitions, | + | Smartness, in the context of smart grid transitions, |
| ^ Form ^ What it involves ^ | ^ Form ^ What it involves ^ | ||
| - | | Technical smartness | ICT layers enabling sensing, communication, | + | | **Technical smartness** | ICT layers enabling sensing, communication, |
| - | | Social smartness | Designs that achieve their aims while maintaining democratic participation and user agency | | + | | **Social smartness** | Designs that achieve their aims while maintaining democratic participation and user agency | |
| - | | Financial smartness | Mechanisms that sustain continuous energy access while protecting revenue flows | | + | | **Financial smartness** | Mechanisms that sustain continuous energy access while protecting revenue flows | |
| - | | Governmental smartness | Relationships with public electricity infrastructure and regulatory frameworks that shape what is possible | | + | | **Governmental smartness** | Relationships with public electricity infrastructure and regulatory frameworks that shape what is possible | |
| ===== Perspectives ===== | ===== Perspectives ===== | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| <WRAP case> | <WRAP case> | ||
| **India -- sociotechnical microgrids** \\ | **India -- sociotechnical microgrids** \\ | ||
| - | A smart idea could only be considered socially smart if it achieves | + | Research on microgrid deployments in India found that a technically capable system |
| </ | </ | ||
| ==== Technologies and infrastructure ==== | ==== Technologies and infrastructure ==== | ||
| - | Technical smartness — smart meters, automated controls, ICT integration — is necessary but not sufficient. Its effectiveness depends on whether the devices and data it generates are embedded in financial and social arrangements that users understand and accept. Smart meters that tie into joint liability financing mechanisms illustrate how technical and non-technical components can reinforce each other. | + | Technical smartness — smart meters, automated controls, ICT integration — is necessary but not sufficient. Its effectiveness depends on whether the devices and data it generates are embedded in financial and social arrangements that users understand and accept. Smart meters that tie into joint liability financing mechanisms illustrate how technical and non-technical components can reinforce each other when designed in concert. |
| + | |||
| + | @@GAP@@ Case examples needed: add one case showing how a technical smartness component succeeded or failed depending on the non-technical conditions surrounding it. | ||
| ==== Institutional structures ==== | ==== Institutional structures ==== | ||
| Governmental smartness describes how distributed energy systems position themselves in relation to state electricity infrastructure and regulation. Where public grid infrastructure is present or expanding, smart solutions must navigate their relationship to it — as complement, stepping stone, or longer-term alternative. This relationship involves legitimacy, subsidy structures, and the political economy of energy access. | Governmental smartness describes how distributed energy systems position themselves in relation to state electricity infrastructure and regulation. Where public grid infrastructure is present or expanding, smart solutions must navigate their relationship to it — as complement, stepping stone, or longer-term alternative. This relationship involves legitimacy, subsidy structures, and the political economy of energy access. | ||
| + | |||
| + | @@GAP@@ Case examples needed: add one case showing how the relationship between a distributed smart energy system and public electricity infrastructure shaped outcomes. | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | ===== Related topics | + | ===== Distinctions and overlaps |
| - | {{tag> | + | <WRAP distinction> |
| + | **Smartness vs digitalisation**\\ | ||
| + | Digitalisation | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP distinction> | ||
| + | **Technical smartness vs smart grid**\\ | ||
| + | Smart grid is commonly used as a technical term denoting ICT-enabled grid capabilities. Smartness as developed here reframes the smart grid question: the relevant question is not whether a grid has smart technology, but whether the full sociotechnical configuration — technical, social, financial, governmental — is fit for the context and the transition it is meant to serve. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related topics ===== | ||
| + | [[topics: | ||
| - | ===== References | + | ===== Topic notes ===== |
| + | ~~Discussion~~ | ||