Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| topics:readiness [2026/03/26 15:19] – o.sachs | topics:readiness [2026/04/13 10:06] (current) – o.sachs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| sensitivity: | sensitivity: | ||
| status: in-review | status: in-review | ||
| - | ai-use: | + | ai-use: |
| </ | </ | ||
| <WRAP intro> | <WRAP intro> | ||
| Readiness describes the degree to which a technology, institution, | Readiness describes the degree to which a technology, institution, | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | |||
| - | <WRAP insight> | ||
| - | Readiness in smart grid transitions is multidimensional — technical maturity alone does not determine whether a solution can be deployed, scaled, or integrated. | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 59: | Line 55: | ||
| | **Bankability** | A state where a technology has demonstrated sufficient commercial readiness to be considered low-risk for standard commercial financing. | | | **Bankability** | A state where a technology has demonstrated sufficient commercial readiness to be considered low-risk for standard commercial financing. | | ||
| | **Socio-technical assemblage** | The combination of hardware, rules, user practices, and infrastructures that must co-evolve for a transition to succeed. | | | **Socio-technical assemblage** | The combination of hardware, rules, user practices, and infrastructures that must co-evolve for a transition to succeed. | | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| <WRAP figure> | <WRAP figure> | ||
| - | {{scaling_readiness_sartas_et_al_2020.jpg? | ||
| - | |||
| **Figure 1.** Scaling readiness: action-oriented support for multi-stakeholder processes.\\ | **Figure 1.** Scaling readiness: action-oriented support for multi-stakeholder processes.\\ | ||
| //Source: Sartas et al. (2020).((Sartas, | //Source: Sartas et al. (2020).((Sartas, | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ===== Perspectives ===== | ===== Perspectives ===== | ||