Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
topics:institutions [2026/03/18 09:55] – admintopics:institutions [2026/03/18 10:44] (current) – admin
Line 1: Line 1:
-<WRAP catbadge blue>General Topics</WRAP>+<WRAP catbadge blue>Institutions & Markets</WRAP>
  
 ====== Institutions ====== ====== Institutions ======
  
 <WRAP meta> <WRAP meta>
-lead-authors: Klaus Kubeczko+lead-authors: Klaus Kubeczko, Vitaliy Soloviy
 contributors: [Names] contributors: [Names]
 reviewers: [Names] reviewers: [Names]
-version: 1.0 +version: 3.0 
-updated: March 2026+updated: 18 March 2026
 sensitivity: medium sensitivity: medium
-ai-disclosure: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) assisted with topic structuring, editorial revision, reference verification, and formatting; reviewed by [name], 17.03.2026+ai-disclosure:  . Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) assisted with topic structuring, editorial revision, reference verification, and formatting; reviewed by Vitaliy Soloviy, 17.03.2026
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 <WRAP intro> <WRAP intro>
-Institutions define the rules of the game for energy systems.((North, D. C. (1990). //Institutions, institutional change and economic performance.// Cambridge University Press.)) They range from formal grid codes, market regulations, and licensing regimes to informal engineering practices and professional norms, and they reduce uncertainty and enable the long-term coordination that electricity systems depend on. When actors make investment decisions, negotiate contracts, or design control systems, they do so within institutional frameworks that shape what is possible, permissible, and expected.+Institutions define the rules of the game for energy systems.((North, D. C. (1990). //Institutions, institutional change and economic performance.// Cambridge University Press.)) They range from formal grid codes, market regulations, and licensing regimes to informal engineering practices and professional norms, and they reduce uncertainty and enable the long-term coordination that electricity systems depend on. When actors make investment decisions, negotiate contracts, or design control systems, they do so within institutional frameworks that shape what is possible, allowed and expected.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
Line 27: Line 27:
 ===== A shared definition ===== ===== A shared definition =====
  
-Institutions are the formal and informal rules, norms, and shared expectations that structure how actors in electricity systems interact, make decisions, and coordinate.((North, D. C. (1990). //Institutions, institutional change and economic performance.// Cambridge University Press.)) Douglas North described them as "the humanly devised constraints that structure political, economic and social interactions." Walton Hamilton offered a complementary framing: institutions as "a way of thought or action of some prevalence and permanence, which is embedded in the habit of a group or the customs of a people." +Institutions are the formal and informal rules, norms, and shared expectations that structure how actors in electricity systems interact, make decisions, and coordinate. They can be seen as "the humanly devised constraints that structure political, economic and social interactions."((North, D. C. (1990). //Institutions, institutional change and economic performance.// Cambridge University Press.))  There are three commonly agreed types of institutions, each operating through different mechanisms and affecting actor behaviour in different ways:((Scott, W. R. (2014). //Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities// (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.))
- +
-For smart grid transitions, W. Richard Scott's framework distinguishes three types of institution, each operating through different mechanisms and affecting actor behaviour in different ways:((Scott, W. R. (2014). //Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities// (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.))+
  
 ^ ^ Regulative ^ Normative ^ Cultural-cognitive ^ ^ ^ Regulative ^ Normative ^ Cultural-cognitive ^
Line 119: Line 117:
 **Institutions vs. organisations** \\ **Institutions vs. organisations** \\
 Institutions are the rules of the game. Organisations are groups of individuals bound by a common purpose who operate within those rules. A regulatory body is an organisation; the regulations it enforces are institutions. Although organisations can be considered formalised institutions, institutions are more than organisations — their main characteristic is their permanence and the expectations they embed in practice.((North, D. C. (1990). //Institutions, institutional change and economic performance.// Cambridge University Press.)) Institutions are the rules of the game. Organisations are groups of individuals bound by a common purpose who operate within those rules. A regulatory body is an organisation; the regulations it enforces are institutions. Although organisations can be considered formalised institutions, institutions are more than organisations — their main characteristic is their permanence and the expectations they embed in practice.((North, D. C. (1990). //Institutions, institutional change and economic performance.// Cambridge University Press.))
-</WRAP> 
- 
-<WRAP distinction> 
-**Regulatory sandboxes vs. regulatory innovation experiments** \\ 
-Sandboxes provide temporary rule modifications so that innovators can test solutions within a protected space. Regulatory innovation experiments are designed to test new regulatory approaches themselves, generating evidence about how rules could be improved.((Bauknecht, D., & Kubeczko, K. (2024). Regulatory experiments and real-world labs. //GAIA//, 33(S1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.33.S1.7)) 
 </WRAP> </WRAP>