Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
topics:flexibility_markets [2026/03/25 11:38] – admintopics:flexibility_markets [2026/04/13 10:15] (current) – o.sachs
Line 8: Line 8:
 contributors: ISGAN Working Group 9 contributors: ISGAN Working Group 9
 reviewers: [Names] reviewers: [Names]
-version: 0.5+version: 0.7
 updated: 25 March 2026 updated: 25 March 2026
 sensitivity: low sensitivity: low
-status: planned +status: draft 
-ai-use:+ai-use: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) was used for editorial revision, reference verification, and formatting; to be reviewed
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 <WRAP intro> <WRAP intro>
-Flexibility markets are institutional mechanisms through which the flexibility potential of distributed energy resources — generation, storage, and controllable loads — is procured and dispatched to support grid reliability, system utilisation, and renewable integration. This topic draws on a taxonomy developed by ISGAN Working Group 9 to identify and quantify flexibility potential across the four layers that determine what flexibility a resource can actually provide.+Flexibility markets are institutional mechanisms through which the flexibility potential of distributed energy resources (generation, storage, and controllable loads) is procured and dispatched to support grid reliability, system utilisation, and renewable integration. This topic draws on a taxonomy developed by ISGAN Working Group 9 to identify and quantify flexibility potential across the four layers that determine what flexibility a resource can actually provide.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-<WRAP insight> 
-Flexibility markets can only work if flexibility potential is first quantified — and that depends on technology, communication infrastructure, location, and customer willingness in equal measure. 
-</WRAP> 
  
 ===== Why this matters ===== ===== Why this matters =====
Line 89: Line 86:
  
 **Content notes:** **Content notes:**
-  * This page draws primarily on ISGAN WG9 (Wadhera et al., 2023). The factsheet is an ISGAN discussion paper — a work in progress, not a final outcome. Content has been reformatted for the wiki template with minimal changes to substance. +  * This page draws primarily on ISGAN WG9 (Wadhera et al., 2023). Content has been reformatted for the wiki template with minimal changes to substance. 
-  * The topic scope as currently structured focuses on quantifying flexibility potential. A broader treatment of flexibility markets — market design, procurement mechanisms, pricing — needs to be developed separately or integrated here. See [[topics:flexibility|Flexibility]] and [[topics:markets|Markets]]. +  * The topic scope as currently structured focuses on quantifying flexibility potential. A broader treatment of flexibility markets, market design, procurement mechanisms, pricing, needs to be developed separately or integrated here. See [[topics:flexibility|Flexibility]] and [[topics:markets|Markets]] 
-  * Page owner: Anjali Wadhera, WG9. +  * Figure 1 is currently 612×229px (16KB) — low resolution. Needs higher-resolution version.
-  * Figure 1 is currently 612×229px (16KB) — low resolution. Request a higher-resolution version from WG9 before publication.+
   * Table 1 indicator references from the original paper: indicators are drawn from Ma et al. (2013), Degefa et al. (2021), Ma et al. (2013 demand response), NERC (2017), Junker et al. (2018), Oldewurtel et al. (2013), Pratt & Taylor (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Balint & Kazmi (2019), Wang et al. (2018). Full reference list available in the source factsheet.   * Table 1 indicator references from the original paper: indicators are drawn from Ma et al. (2013), Degefa et al. (2021), Ma et al. (2013 demand response), NERC (2017), Junker et al. (2018), Oldewurtel et al. (2013), Pratt & Taylor (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Balint & Kazmi (2019), Wang et al. (2018). Full reference list available in the source factsheet.