Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| topics:change [2026/03/19 14:25] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | topics:change [2026/03/19 16:01] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation admin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[merge_into_other_topics: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[merge_into_other_topics: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Theory of Change (ToC) ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Theory of Change (ToC) [Simeone et al. 2023] ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | "We see Theory of Change as a fruitful and effective framework to support **strategic thinking**. Born in the mid-1990s within the context of philanthropic and development programmes and deployed in numerous social innovation initiatives (Stein & Valters, 2012), Theory of Change has demonstrated its potential to support efforts towards change-making and towards effective organizational or societal change. **Theory of Change is a way of thinking that systematically attempts to map the critical factors** (for example, psychological, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cases of using Theory of Change in the book relate "to support social design interventions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | [source: Simeone, Luca, David Drabble, Nicola Morelli, and Amalia De Götzen. ‘Introduction to Strategic Thinking, Design and the Theory of Change’. In Strategic Thinking, Design and the Theory of Change, edited by Luca Simeone, David Drabble, Nicola Morelli, and Amalia De Götzen, 1–19. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023. https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Theory of Change - Continuum of purpose [Stein & Valters 2012]===== | ||
| + | "Just as definitions of ToC vary widely, this literature review found that organisations and donors also view ToC as having a variety of purposes. With this in mind, we propose that ToC approaches can be understood across a continuum. At the far left end is a very technical understanding of ToC representing its use as a **precise planning tool**, most likely as an extension of the ‘assumptions’ box in a logframe. In the middle is ‘ToC thinking’ – suggested by many as the key element of a ToC process – understood as a less formal, often implicit, use as a **‘way of thinking’ about how a project is expected to work**. On the far right side is an approach to ToC which emphasises the need for practitioners to develop ‘political literacy’, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Within this continuum, they have identified four broad categories of purpose: | ||
| + | | ||
| + | **Strategic planning:** ToC helps organisations practically to map the change process and its expected outcomes and facilitates project implementation. For these purposes, ToC is often used in conjunction with logframe approaches. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Monitoring and evaluation**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Description**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Learning**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [source: Stein, Danielle, and Craig Valters. ‘Understanding Theory of Change in International Development’. JSRP and TAF collaborative project. JSRP Paper 1. London: Justice and Security Research Programme, International Development Department, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2012. http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Differences Between the Theory of Change and the Logic Model [A.-M. Brown 2016] ===== | ||
| + | -> [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | -> [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ~~DISCUSSION|Discussion Section - PAGE OWNER: Klaus Kubeczko~~ | ||