Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
merge_into_other_topics:provisioning_systems [2026/03/19 15:59] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1merge_into_other_topics:provisioning_systems [2026/03/19 16:02] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation 74.7.227.5
Line 1: Line 1:
 +[[merge_into_other_topics:public_service]];
  
 +[[topics:systems]]; 
 +
 +[[energy_-_service_of_public_interest|]]
 +
 +[[topics:human_rights]]
 +
 +[[topics:targets]]
 +
 +
 +
 +====== Provisioning Systems (PVS) ======
 +
 +==== Energy Provisioning System - building on O’Neill et al. (2018) [Fanning et al 2020] ====
 +
 + **Provisioning system** in the context of energy is defined as "a set of related elements that work together in the transformation of resources to satisfy a foreseen human need. In this definition, each need satisfier can be mapped onto a provisioning system that is made up of a set of related elements."
 +
 +{{:provisioning_systems_fanning_et_al_2020_jpg.jpg?800|}}
 +
 +[Source: Fanning, Andrew L., Daniel W. O’Neill, and Milena Büchs. ‘Provisioning Systems for a Good Life within Planetary Boundaries’. Global Environmental Change 64 (September 2020): 102135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102135.]
 +
 +==== Definition - Provisioning Systems [O’Neill et. al. 2018] ====
 +
 +"... **provisioning systems** comprise both physical and social systems; the former include networks of physical infrastructure, technologies and their efficiencies, while the latter encompass government institutions, communities and markets Provisioning systems mediate the relationship between biophysical resource use and social outcomes. For example, different forms of transportation infrastructure (railways versus highways) generate similar social outcomes at very different levels of resource use."
 +
 +{{:provisioning_system_o_neill_2018.jpg?800|}}
 +
 +[Source: O’Neill, Daniel W, Andrew L Fanning, William F Lamb, and Julia K Steinberger. ‘A Good Life for All within Planetary Boundaries’. Nature Sustainability 1, no. 2 (2018): 88–95.]
 +
 +==== Stock-flow-service nexus (SFS-nexus) [Plank et al. 2021]====
 +
 +{{::sfs-nexus.jpg?900|}}
 +
 +[Plank, C., Liehr, S., Hummel, D., Wiedenhofer, D., Haberl, H., Görg, C., 2021. Doing more with less: Provisioning systems and the transformation of the stock-flow-service nexus. Ecological Economics 187, 107093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107093]
 +
 +
 +~~DISCUSSION|Discussion Section - PAGE OWNER: Klaus Kubeczko~~